Comparative analysis of three different modalities for perception of artifacts in videos
This study compares three popular modalities for analyzing perceived video quality; user ratings, eye tracking and EEG.
We contrast these three modalities for a given video sequence to determine if there is a gap between what humans consciously see and what we implicitly perceive. Participants are shown a video sequence with different artifacts appearing at specific distances in their field of vision; near foveal, middle peripheral and far peripheral.
Our results show distinct differences between what we saccade to (eye-tracking), how we consciously rate video quality and our neural responses (EEG data). Our findings indicate that the measurement of perceived quality depends on the specific modality used.
| Author(s): | Jan-Philipp Tauscher, Maryam Mustafa, Marcus Magnor |
|---|---|
| Published: | September 2017 |
| Type: | Article |
| Journal: | ACM Transactions on Applied Perception Vol. 14 |
| DOI: | 10.1145/3129289 |
| Presented at: | ACM Symposium on Applied Perception (SAP) 2017 |
| Project(s): | Video Quality Assessment ElectroEncephaloGraphics Immersive Digital Reality |
@article{tauscher2017comparative,
title = {Comparative analysis of three different modalities for perception of artifacts in videos},
author = {Tauscher, Jan-Philipp and Mustafa, Maryam and Magnor, Marcus},
journal = {{ACM} Transactions on Applied Perception},
doi = {10.1145/3129289},
volume = {14},
number = {4},
pages = {1--12},
month = {Sep},
year = {2017}
}
Authors
-
Jan-Philipp Tauscher
Senior Researcher -
Maryam Mustafa
Fmr. Senior Researcher -
Marcus Magnor
Director, Chair